![iphoto for mac 10.9.2 iphoto for mac 10.9.2](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/ipod/images/1/1c/2013-4_OS_X_10.9.5_(Mavericks).png)
- Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 how to#
- Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 mac os#
- Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 update#
- Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 code#
- Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 free#
Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 code#
My Time Machine 3TB had NO issues with performance so it's something in the FreeNAS code that needs to be looked at.Ģ.
Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 how to#
Someone should figure out how to make it faster. Sparse bundles are definitely a step in the right direction but DMGs keep the dog slow CNID database out of the equation. Solution? Create sparse bundles, then dmgs. I don't care how fast a processor, quad Intel NIC, and screaming fast SATA drives, it's still dog slow. If you have oodles of files in directories, good luck - you're performance on FreeNAS is going to suck balls. The "cloud" providers suck for massive amounts of data *AND* large file sizes. But I have a single Tme Machine backup that has grown to almost 3TB. Google Drive has a file limit of 10GB, Dropbox and Box are 2GB. It was getting to the point that I needed something bigger. Until recently, I would just mirror my drives, use Google Drive, use box, use dropbox, etc. I pretty much have all my digital data going back 25 years and I am intent on keeping it. I may *never* use some of this stuff ever again, but if I want or need it, I would like to be able to get to it quickly. The point is that I have YEARS of backups, sparse bundles, iPhone, iPad, and every other of device not to mention the Terabytes of data in images from iPhoto libraries. Sure, I'm a dork for being so married to Apple and AFP but that's not the point. I believe that the developers need to do some work on figuring out how to make the CNID database more scale and USEABLE. I struggled for almost a week trying to figure out why I had such awful performance. I wanted to weigh in with some painful lessons learned using AFP on FreeNAS. I am moving data over than growing to a 5 x 4 TB SATA NIC onboard ASUS Realtek (FWIW - I tried an INTEL NIC and it made ZERO difference in my setup) Mobo ASUS M4A785TD-M EVO 16 GB /AMD Athlon II initial setup SATA 3 x 4 TB WD ST4000DM000 (ripped out of the desktop enclosures).
![iphoto for mac 10.9.2 iphoto for mac 10.9.2](https://imobie-resource.com/en/support/img/why-is-my-mac-so-slow2-1.png)
I might be able to test different OS X versions soon to see if this is related to just 10.9.x. but had to be replaced since performance got really bad with FreeNAS v9, so I just gave in and got an IntelNIC as everyone advised to. The onboard NIC on the ASUS E35M1-I used to be fine with FreeNAS v8 btw. Server: FreeNAS 9.2.1 on a 16 GB USB2 drive, ASUS E35M1-I w/ AMD E-350, 16GB RAM, 6x 3TB WD Red in RAIDZ2, Intel NIC.Ĭlient: OS X 10.9.1 on a MacBook Air i7 GHz via GBit Ethernet (WLAN is much worse ofcourse).
Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 free#
I doubt more RAM would improve much as I see the same issues right after booting up when there is lots of free RAM. I understand my CPU is kinda slow but it usually does not get close to 100% and I cannot find any other bottleneck (drive io is fine, iperf io is fine (again, since v9.2.1)). In my case this might be related to my hardware or configuration as I was aiming for energy efficiency with my setup, but I fail to see where.
![iphoto for mac 10.9.2 iphoto for mac 10.9.2](http://www.ijailbreak.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/facetime_hero_20110720.jpg)
Naturally I am only seeing speeds of around 10-40 MB/s when doing Timemachine backups over AFP. Typical continuous transfer speeds of large files are fine and around 85-95 MB/s with peaks at 105-110 MB/s. Same when copying a bunch of smaller files, anything smaller than about 1 MB is awefully slow with speeds around 2-6 MB/s (could the harddrives blocksize play a significant role here? I thought I would have enough RAM to avoid any substantial effect here should it even matter). Since FreeNAS v9.2.1 AFP speeds have improved a lot again, but directory listing is still pretty slow, around 4 KB/s sometimes, typically around 20-40 KB/s, never above 100 KB/s. Let me know if I need to provide more details on my setup. Has anyone else experienced this same poor performance with AFP/CIFS when accessing from a Mac? Unfortunately, I do not have a non-Mavericks Mac to test with to see if the problem exists prior to Mavericks.
Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 update#
Synology issued an update sometime in November that fixed the issue (i think there were updates/config changes to both Samba and netatalk.
![iphoto for mac 10.9.2 iphoto for mac 10.9.2](https://www.addictivetips.com/app/uploads/2012/06/iPhoto-For-Mac-OS-X-Tips-Problems-Solutions.jpg)
Iphoto for mac 10.9.2 mac os#
I had similar issues with a now retired Synology Disk Station after updating to Mac OS 10.9 Mavericks this fall. Under Mac OS, I am seeing around 40 MB/s reads (using CIFS or AFP) and a dismal 1 to 2 MB/s writes. The CIFS performance under windows is normal (ethernet is maxed out at 100+ MB/s, wireless is as good as it can be in my area). I get terrible performance on the AFP (or CIFS) when accessing from Mac OS 10.9 Mavericks. I have an AFP and CIFS share pointing to the same dataset. No special configurations-only have Plex plugin running (transmission is installed, but disabled). I have a relatively new FreeNAS box setup (about 2 weeks old):